I attended a conference today at Martin Chautari on Tibetan Medicine and healers. 4 Tibetan Medicine scholars led it;
Dr. Sienna Craig, Dartmouth College
Calum Blaikie, University of Kent
Barbara Gerke, Humbolt University
Theresia Hofer, University of Oslo.
They came to Nepal as THE HIMALAYAN AMCHI ASSOCIATION, which was founded in 1998. Also partly supported by Ministry of Health and CTEVT.
It was 8 daylong workshop programme on “Making Efficacious Medicines”. Amchis (Tibetan medical doctors) from various parts of Nepal, India and Tibet participated and shared their experience. Educated one another about their recipe of medicines, so and so forth. Unfortunately I did not get chance to participate in the workshop but I attended last day talk at Martin Chautari.
Dr. Sienna, Calum, Barabara and Theresia took their turn and explained about the situation of Tibetan Medicines and amchis in Nepal, China, Tibet and India.
Here are the few interesting points that I found interesting and jotted down as notes:
- I always had misconception that Ayurveda and Tibetan medicine were same.
-To become an Amchi, one has to excel in botany, geography, geology, chemistry, trading (sell them), and also at the end in teaching.
Botany- to identify the plants/herbs
Geography/Geology- to understand what plants grow at which climate or palces
Chemistry: Knowledge of proportion of several herbs to make medicine.
Trading: right skill to sell the medicines
Teaching: Teach medical studies to the generation next.
-According to Amchis, their laboratory is their tongue. They taste to test the quality and efficacy of the ingredients.
-Amchis are constantly working on finding substitutions for the must-ingredients from endangered animals like rhino horn, tiger paw, elephant gallbladder etc. And same goes for the endangered plants too. Meanwhile, lots of fake ingredients are also in market to influence. For eg: vendor rub sandal wood on normal wood and sell it as sandal wood.
-Amchis in India, China and Tibet no more medicines on their own. Factories do their job. This is one of the demerits, due to the institutionalization after their government recognized/certified the Tibetan medicine and its practice.
-Tibetan Medical Hospitals in China and Tibet are blooming in comparison to Nepal, where Tibetan Medical practice is still to be recognized and certified by Government. Hospitals there receive 300 patients everyday. Their factories produce 100 different types of medicines everyday. But there is no practice of cultivation of herbs for future. Consequently, these herbs will extinct in next 20 years.
-Bulk (70%) of the Tibetan medicine ingredients are exported from Nepal, and rest 30% from other parts of the world (Tibet, India, China).
-Nepal Gov doesn’t even know the term “Amchi”, although the practice has existed in Nepal for 1000 years. Due to the dialect problem Amchis of rural areas of Nepal are not organized or institutionalized and still are individuals. Somehow, Amchis from all over Nepal need to come together as a team. They have to work and understand one another and voice their way to get approval from Government.
For that, Amchis at least need to make medicines and prove that they scientifically and practically will cure certain chronic disease.
Also delineate merits of Tibetan medicine v/s western medicine.
-Does one need to be Buddhist to practice Tibetan Medical Science, because Rimpoches (Buddhist masters) empower every medicine before distribution? The empowerment ritual is called Wong.
-What role does empowerment play in medicine? Do Tibetan medicines need mandatory empowerment? Does the process increase the value of Tibetan medicine or is it ok just to use them without empowering?
-According to SOWA RIGPA; medical science should be separated from religion.
-According to Amchis in Lhasa: One doesn’t have to be monk to practice Tibetan medical science. HH Dalai Lama supports it too.
As a sum up, it was wonderful experience to participate in the conference. I learnt many things besides just knowing how to spell amchi.
Other thing that fascinated me was the questions from Anthropology students. Sienna and team were really mesmerized at the participation and interest.
From my past experience at various conferences, the question-answer round was really funny in a bad way, because there, journalist never failed to make fool out of themselves with the kind of questions they ask.